Rm. Levin et al., Effect of diltiazem and pinacidil on the response of the rabbit urinary bladder to repetitive stimulation and in vitro ischemia, NEUROUROL U, 18(2), 1999, pp. 129-137
The effect of repetitive stimulation, in the presence and absence of diltia
zem or pinacidil, on the contractile responses of isolated strips of rabbit
bladder detrusor to field stimulation and carbachol, after 2 hr of incubat
ion in a medium that serves as an in vitro model of ischemia (oxygen and su
bstrate depleted Tyrode's solution), was determined. Our results are summar
ized as follows: a) The magnitude of the contractile dysfunctions after in
vitro ischemia was enhanced by repetitive stimulation. b) Pre-incubation of
isolated strips of detrusor with diltiazem (50 mu M) inhibited the contrac
tile responses to field stimulation (FS) and carbachol by 43 and 50%, respe
ctively. Pinacidil (100 mu M) inhibited the contractile responses to FS and
carbachol by 37 and 32%, respectively. c) Neither diltiazem nor pinacidil
protected the bladder strips against the effects of 2 hr of incubation in i
n vitro ischemia medium. However, d) both pinacidil and diltiazem reduced t
he level of contractile dysfunctions induced by repetitive stimulation. In
conclusion, the contractile response to FS was significantly more sensitive
to in vitro ischemia and repetitive stimulation than was the contractile r
esponse to carbachol. Both diltiazem and pinacidil protected the contractil
e responses to FS and carbachol from the degenerative effects of repetitive
stimulation, but not from the effects of in vitro ischemia. (C) 1999 Wiley
-Liss, Inc.