The 1996 pertussis epidemic in New Zealand: descriptive epidemiology

Citation
T. Blakely et al., The 1996 pertussis epidemic in New Zealand: descriptive epidemiology, NZ MED J, 112(1081), 1999, pp. 30-33
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00288446 → ACNP
Volume
112
Issue
1081
Year of publication
1999
Pages
30 - 33
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-8446(19990212)112:1081<30:T1PEIN>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Aim. To describe the 1996 pertussis epidemic. Methods. Hospitalisation, notification and laboratory data were used to des cribe the 1996 pertussis epidemic and compare it with previous epidemics. Results. The 1996 epidemic spanned 24 months. The crude hospitalisation rat e from 1 June 1995 to 31 May 1997, was 10.1 per 100 000 person years, being highest for children aged six weeks to two months (42 to 90 days old inclu sive; 1402 per 100 000). The 1996 epidemic involved more hospitalisations t han the 1991 and 1986 epidemics, and a greater proportion for children unde r the age of one year (77%), compared to previous epidemics (60-70%). There were no deaths. Pertussis only became notifiable from 1 June 1996. The crude notification r ate for the following twelve months was 19.8 per 100 000 (equivalent hospit alisation rate 6.7 per 100 000); children aged six weeks to two months of a ge had the highest notification rate (531 per 100 000; equivalent hospitali sation rate 1021 per 100 000). In 1996-97, children aged under 15 months ac counted for 21% of notifications, but 82% of hospitalisations. Europeans te nded to have higher rates of notifications than non-Europeans, but lower ra tes of hospitalisation. Conclusions. New Zealand continues to experience high rates of pertussis as a result of inadequate immunisation coverage. The increase in hospitalisat ions during the 1996 epidemic may reflect a real increase in the population -based incidence, or other changes (e.g. hospitalisation practice, increase in vulnerable children with poor access to primary care). Improved rates, accuracy and completeness of pertussis notifications will i mprove the ability of notification data to accurately describe future epide mics and estimate vaccine effectiveness. Further debate is required regardi ng the aims of pertussis immunisation; accelerating the timing of the first three doses and adding further doses of pertussis vaccine on the national immunisation schedule; and the role of acellular pertussis vaccines. In the meantime, the priority must be increasing on-time immunisation coverage.