This paper examines the question of the scaling of mean-velocity profi
les in adverse-pressure-gradient flows. In these flows, the mean veloc
ity scaling must be different than in zero-pressure-gradient flows, be
cause the friction velocity used in the latter case can become vanishi
ngly small in the former. Two decades ago, Ferry and Schofield [Phys.
Fluids 16, 2068 (1973)] proposed a new outer-region scaling law to be
used when the boundary layer approaches separation. Since that time, a
number of sets of experimental data close to separation have been sho
wn to fall on a universal curve when the profiles are plotted in Perry
-Schofield coordinates, and the profile shape was given by Dengel and
Fernholz [J. Fluid Mech. 212, 615 (1990)]. Recently, however, a new se
t of scaling laws has been proposed by Durbin and Belcher [J. Fluid Me
ch. 238, 699 (1992)] as a result of their asymptotic analysis, in whic
h they assumed the appropriate near-wall velocity scale to be based on
the local strength of the pressure gradient. The resulting scaling la
ws are different than Ferry and Schofield's scaling and, in fact, pred
ict a three-layered rather than a two-layered boundary-layer structure
. Here, experimental results are shown for an adverse-pressure-gradien
t boundary layer which separates from and then reattaches to a smooth
surface. These data provide a wide range of flow conditions for compar
ing the conflicting scaling laws mentioned above, under conditions of
both decreasing and increasing skin friction, with and without instant
aneous reverse flow. It is found that the Perry-Schofield coordinates
provide better collapse, over a wider range of streamwise positions an
d over a larger fraction of the boundary layer, than the scaling laws
of Durbin and Belcher. Other proposed scaling laws are also evaluated.
Yaglom's half-power law is shown to hold for a subset of the profiles
which fall on Dengel and Fernholz's universal profile. And the data p
rovide a test of the range of validity of the (zero-pressure-gradient)
logarithmic law of the wall. The law is violated here when instantane
ous reverse flow exists in the boundary layer and/or when the local pr
essure gradient is strong enough, as is consistent with earlier work.
However, after reattachment these criteria are insufficient to indicat
e the return to the log law, and several bubble lengths are required a
fter reattachment before the universal log law is satisfied. The wake
region responds to reattachment more slowly and does not appear fully
recovered six bubble lengths (twenty boundary-layer thicknesses) after
reattachment. (C) 1995 American Institute of Physics.