C. Spreafico et al., HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA IN PATIENTS WHO UNDERGO LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION - SENSITIVITY OF CT WITH IODIZED OIL, Radiology, 203(2), 1997, pp. 457-460
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography (C
T) after hepatic intraarterial injection of iodized oil in patients wi
th hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patien
ts who underwent CT with iodized oil before orthotopic liver transplan
tation (OLT) were evaluated prospectively. All patients underwent digi
tal subtraction angiography and injection of iodized oil during chemoe
mbolization. CT during arterial portography (CTAP) was performed in 34
patients. The number of neoplastic nodules was assessed in explanted
livers and compared with the radiologic results. RESULTS: Sixty-six HC
C nodules were present in the explanted livers. CT with iodized oil en
abled correct diagnosis in 38 of 66 lesions (58%), and the results wer
e false-positive in two lesions (3%). Digital subtraction angiography
had a sensitivity of 67% (44 of 66 nodules) and CTAP had a sensitivity
of 85% (45 of 53 nodules). Four (6%) false-positive diagnoses were ma
de at digital subtraction angiography and three (6%) at CTAP. The diag
nostic efficacy of CT with iodized oil was significantly related to le
sion diameter greater than 2 cm (P < .0001) and hypervascularity (P <
.0001). CONCLUSION: CT with iodized oil failed to provide any substant
ial information in the pre-OLT staging of HCC: It was inaccurate for s
mall HCC nodules (<2 cm) and intrahepatic metastases. Its sensitivity
matched that of digital subtraction angiography and was statistically
significantly inferior to that of CTAP.