Private, voluntary or public? Comparative cost-effectiveness in community mental health care

Citation
M. Knapp et al., Private, voluntary or public? Comparative cost-effectiveness in community mental health care, POLICY POL, 27(1), 1999, pp. 25-41
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
POLICY AND POLITICS
ISSN journal
03055736 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
25 - 41
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-5736(199901)27:1<25:PVOPCC>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Two prominent features of mental health policy in the UK in recent years ha ve been the rundown of hospital provision and the changing of the balance b etween public and other provider sectors. This article examines the cost, q uality of care and outcome implications. Public,voluntary and private provi ders of mental health care are compared, based on a long-term study of peop le moving out of psychiatric hospitals in London. Costs are found to be low est in the private (for-profit) sector, and highest in the NHS and consorti um (NHS and voluntary sector partnership) sectors. However, quality of care indicators suggest that the lowest cost sector is performing least well, a nd the highest cost sectors offer the best quality. These are associated wi th some differences in user outcome.