PURPOSE: To determine the reliability of helical computed tomography (CT) w
ith volume rendering for evaluation of internal carotid arterial stenosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 22 patients, 44 carotid arteries were evaluated w
ith helical CT and selective conventional angiography. CT data were display
ed on volume-rendered and maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. Stenos
es were measured separately on axial, volume-rendered, and MIP images and o
n conventional angiograms. Each artery was then graded as having no stenosi
s, mild (<30%) stenosis, moderate (30%-70%) stenosis, severe (>70%) stenosi
s, near occlusion, or Occlusion.
RESULTS: One case of stenosis was not assessable at axial CT because of an
inappropriate scanning plane; four cases were not assessable at MIP CT beca
use of mural calcifications. All carotid arteries were assessable on volume
-rendered images despite no depiction of the residual lumen at the site of
narrowing in three cases of near occlusion. Correlations between angiograph
y and helical CT were good. Axial, volume-rendered, and MIP images enabled
correct classification of stenosis in 88%, 89%, and 90% of arteries, respec
tively. CT with volume rendering was slightly more sensitive for determinin
g candidates for endarterectomy (ie, those with >70% stenosis and near occl
usion); sensitivity was 100% and specificity, 92%.
CONCLUSION: CT angiography with volume rendering enabled accurate evaluatio
n of carotid disease, even when dense calcifications were present. However,
no definite advantage over currently available techniques for CT measureme
nt of stenosis severity was found.