Y. Takesue et al., The effectiveness of perineal rectosigmoidectomy for the treatment of rectal prolapse in elderly and high-risk patients, SURG TODAY, 29(3), 1999, pp. 290-293
We report herein on the follow-up of ten consecutive patients who underwent
perineal rectosigmoidectomy and discuss the indications, surgical techniqu
e, and outcomes of this procedure. The median age of the patients was 79 ye
ars, with a range of 26 to 85 years, and eight patients had com plicating m
edical conditions. Of five patients who underwent this procedure for a recu
rrent prolapse after another type of perineal procedure, four had previousl
y undergone the Thiersch operation combined with the Gant-Miwa technique. T
he mean length of the excised rectum and sigmoid colon was 22.1cm. Pain was
minimal or absent in all patients and oral intake was commenced after 2 da
ys. There were no mortalities, but anastomotic leakage occurred in one pati
ent, The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years. Only one patient developed re
current rectal prolapse 24 months after the operation. Of seven patients wh
o underwent concomitant levatoroplasty for incontinence, five became fully
continent within 3 weeks after the operation, while the remaining two impro
ved after 2 months. We propose that perineal rectosigmoidectomy is indicate
d for patients who have suffered an early recurrence of prolapse after anot
her transperineal repair; elderly or highrisk patients with incontinence; m
ale patients; and patients with an incarcerated or gangrenous prolapsed rec
tal segment.