Estrus detection efficacy and heat detection protocol were studied by means
of a field study carried out on 878 lactating beef cows in 60 French herds
. Average herd size was 48, and 75 % of the farmers partly or exclusively u
sed artificial insemination. The cows were calved between October 1992 and
March 1993. Estrus was recorded daily by the farmers. Cycling status was de
termined by progesterone radioimmuno-assay 2 months after calving. The rela
tionship between the estrus detection protocol and the delay period from ca
lving to first observed estrus was analysed using survival curves and the C
ox proportional hazard model, adjusting for confounders. Seventy-one percen
t of the cows were seen in estrus by the farmers; the interval between calv
ing and the first observed estrus ranged from 9 days to more than 5 months
and the median was 56 days. Two months after calving, 44 % of the cycling c
ows had not been seen in heat by the farmers and 11 % of the non-cycling co
ws had been reported to have been in estrus. The heat detection protocol va
ried widely between farmers, depending on the considered estrus signs, sche
dule and time spent looking for signs. Two factors were significantly relat
ed to a shorter interval from calving to first observed heat: the use of ar
tificial insemination (which relates to the farmer's interest in heat detec
tion) and an overall daily time spent for heat detection greater than 1 h.
Cows in tie stalls had a delayed interval to the first observed estrus. The
se results show that many farmers did not adapt their reproduction practice
sufficiently to an earlier calving period. There is room for improvement s
ince in many cases the heat detection protocol does not match the required
standards for optimal heat detection. (C) Inra/Elsevier, Paris.