A field study on estrus detection in lactating beef cattle

Citation
C. Ducrot et al., A field study on estrus detection in lactating beef cattle, VET RES, 30(1), 1999, pp. 87-98
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
VETERINARY RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09284249 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
87 - 98
Database
ISI
SICI code
0928-4249(199901/02)30:1<87:AFSOED>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Estrus detection efficacy and heat detection protocol were studied by means of a field study carried out on 878 lactating beef cows in 60 French herds . Average herd size was 48, and 75 % of the farmers partly or exclusively u sed artificial insemination. The cows were calved between October 1992 and March 1993. Estrus was recorded daily by the farmers. Cycling status was de termined by progesterone radioimmuno-assay 2 months after calving. The rela tionship between the estrus detection protocol and the delay period from ca lving to first observed estrus was analysed using survival curves and the C ox proportional hazard model, adjusting for confounders. Seventy-one percen t of the cows were seen in estrus by the farmers; the interval between calv ing and the first observed estrus ranged from 9 days to more than 5 months and the median was 56 days. Two months after calving, 44 % of the cycling c ows had not been seen in heat by the farmers and 11 % of the non-cycling co ws had been reported to have been in estrus. The heat detection protocol va ried widely between farmers, depending on the considered estrus signs, sche dule and time spent looking for signs. Two factors were significantly relat ed to a shorter interval from calving to first observed heat: the use of ar tificial insemination (which relates to the farmer's interest in heat detec tion) and an overall daily time spent for heat detection greater than 1 h. Cows in tie stalls had a delayed interval to the first observed estrus. The se results show that many farmers did not adapt their reproduction practice sufficiently to an earlier calving period. There is room for improvement s ince in many cases the heat detection protocol does not match the required standards for optimal heat detection. (C) Inra/Elsevier, Paris.