Sulfate deposition and exports from 1988-92 were analyzed for a small headw
ater catchment in north-central West Virginia. Annual sulfate inputs, estim
ated by applying throughfall-adjusted ratios to bulk deposition values, and
outputs were approximately equal for the five years. Annual mean throughfa
ll-adjusted deposition and export loads were 55.78 and 55.48 kg ha(-1),resp
ectively. While these results indicate the watershed has reached sulfate eq
uilibrium relative to current deposition levels, seasonal sulfate accumulat
ions and deficits were evident. Deposition and exports averaged 5.61 and 2.
49 kg ha(-1) mo(-1), respectively, during the growing season, and 3.69 and
5.22 kg ha(-1) mo(-1) during the dormant season. Sulfur accumulated within
the soil during the growing season mo because inputs of wet and dry sulfur
deposition were high while outputs were negligible. The latter was due larg
ely to the lack of runoff resulting from high evapotranspirational demands.
By contrast, net sulfate losses occurred during dormant seasons, primarily
due to high runoff, even though inputs declined during this season. Resear
chers working on other watersheds have interpreted similar input/output pat
terns to mean that sulfate accumulated during the growing season is the sou
rce of sulfate exported during the dormant season. However, radioisotopic e
vidence from a companion study on this watershed showed that some labeled s
ulfate applied to the watershed more than a year earlier was still present
in the organic and mineral soil layers at the point of application (with so
me as soluble sulfate), and in soil water dispersed throughout the watershe
d. Tts presence indicates that dormant season exports can originate from su
lfate deposited over longer periods than just the previous growing season o
r even previous year. Volume-weighted concentrations in soil leachate sugge
st that dormant-season sulfate losses resulted from progressive depletion o
f the anion through the soil profile. During the fall and early winter, sol
uble sulfate was depleted in the upper soil horizons; in later winter, depl
etion occurred in the lower horizons.