When no discharge record is available for a site, a regional regression rel
ationship can be used to estimate low-flow quantiles. Problems arise in the
derivation of such models when some at-site quantile estimates are reporte
d as zero. One concern is that quantile estimates reported as zero may be i
n the range from zero to the measurement threshold. A second concern is tha
t a logarithmic transformation cannot be used with zero quantile estimates,
so traditional log linear least squares estimators cannot be computed. Thi
s paper uses visual examples and Monte Carlo simulation to compare the perf
ormance of techniques for estimating the parameters of a regional regressio
n model when some at-site quantile estimates are zero. Ordinary least squar
es (OLS) techniques employed in practice include adding a small constant to
all at-site quantile estimates (denoted OLSC), or neglecting all observati
on reported as zero (denoted OLSD). OLSC and OLSD performed poorly compared
to the use of a Tobit model, which is a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE)
procedure that represents the below threshold estimates as a range from ze
ro to the threshold level. For a small amount of censoring, the OLSD method
can be acceptable. A weighted Tobit model that accounts for the heterosced
asticity of the residuals in the regression model provided relatively littl
e gain over the ordinary Tobit model.