In spite of quite a few clinical trials the benefit of venous thrombectomy
is seen controversely. The primary objectives of treating venous thrombosis
are survival rate, prevention of pulmonary embolism and of postthrombotic
syndrome. We report our experience with 47 patients who underwent venous th
rombectomy. The mortality rate was 0%. We did not observe clinically releva
nt pulmonary embolism. After two years 90% of thrombectomised veins were pa
tent. The mortality rates given in the literature of conservative treatment
with heparin and following oral anticoagulation are 0.4 to 1.6%. Fibrinoly
sis shows mortality rates of 1 to 2.4, and thrombectomy of 3.8%, respective
ly. Venous thrombectomy is an effective treatment to prevent pulmonary embo
lism. In our own experience we saw no clinically significant pulmonary even
t. The danger of embolism rises with the proximity of the venous thrombus.
Therefore those patients may have the greatest potential benefit from throm
bectomy who present with a mobile inguinal thrombus or a thrombus in the il
iac vein. So far there are no statistically sufficient data to support the
indication of thrombectomy to prevent a postthrombotic syndrome.