Historically, seizure semiology was the main feature in the differential di
agnosis of epileptic syndromes. With the development of clinical EEG, the d
efinition of electroclinical complexes became an essential tool to define e
pileptic syndromes, particularly focal epileptic syndromes. Modern advances
in diagnostic technology, particularly in neuroimaging and molecular biolo
gy, now permit better definitions of epileptic syndromes. At the same time
detailed studies showed that there does not necessarily exist a one-to-one
relationship between epileptic seizures or electroclinical complexes and ep
ileptic syndromes. These developments call for the reintroduction of an epi
leptic seizure classification based exclusively on clinical semiology, simi
lar to the seizure classifications which were used by neurologists before t
he introduction of the modern diagnostic methods. This classification of ep
ileptic seizures should always be complemented by an epileptic syndrome cla
ssification based on all. the available clinical information (clinical hist
ory, neurological exam, ictal semiology, EEG, anatomical and functional neu
roimaging, etc.). Such an approach is more consistent with mainstream clini
cal neurology and would avoid the current confusion between the classificat
ion of epileptic seizures (which in the International Seizure Classificatio
n is actually a classification of electroclinical complexes) and the classi
fication of epileptic syndromes.