A balanced discussion on the ethics of randomized clinical trials should no
t be based on a single ethical aspect such as respect for the patient's aut
onomy. Rather, the analysis should consider the four ethical principles-res
pect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice-as applicable
to ail groups of persons concerned. We present the ethical benefits and cos
ts of the present practice of randomized clinical trials for four groups: p
atients involved in clinical trials, patients not involved in trials, parti
cipating physicians and society. The ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable
) approach is then introduced and practical measures to achieve a positive
balance beta een ethical benefits and costs of randomized trials are propos
ed.