H. Kostamaa et al., Calcified plaque cross-sectional area in human arteries: Correlation between intravascular ultrasound and undecalcified histology, AM HEART J, 137(3), 1999, pp. 482-488
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the amount of
intralesional calcium defected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) compared.
with undecalcified histology in human arteries. This method preserves intr
alesional calcium and reduces sectioning artifacts; thereby providing an ac
curate measure of calcium plaque morphology.
Methods and Results Ten arterial segments (5 coronary, 5 iliac) were obtain
ed at autopsy. IVUS imaging was performed with,a 4.9F catheter at an automa
ted pullback rate of 1.0 mm/s. The undecalcified arteries were dehydrated i
n ascending alcohol and polymerized in glycol methylmethacrylate. The arter
ies were cut into 200-mu m sections with an Isomet low-speed saw and staine
d with Goldner's trichrome. The lumen cross-sectional area, the calcium pla
que cross-sectional area, the calcium plaque depth, length, and angle of ar
c,of calcified plaque were measured from the IVUS images and histologic sec
tions. In 24 selected cross sections, there were 38 separate calcium plaque
s. An independent observer correctly identified;34 of 38 calcified plaques
for a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 97%. The total mean calcified p
laque cross-sectional area measured from histology was 4.6 +/- 4.1 mm(2) co
mpared with 2.8 +/- 2.3 mm(2) by IVUS (P=.002), Plaque depth measured by hi
stology was 1.2 +/- 0.4 mm verses 0.7 +/- 0.2 mm by IVUS (P =.001). The len
gth of calcium plaques measured by histology was 3.6 +/- 1.78 mm versus 3.6
+/-: 1.5 mm for IVUS (r = 0.79).
Conclusions IVUS accurately depicts circumferential calcified lesions with
high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (97%). However, IVUS underestimates
the total calcified plaque cross-sectional area by 39%. This is mainly beca
use of the inability of the ultrasound to penetrate intralesional calcium,
which leads to an underestimation of the depth of calcium by 45%.