Diagnostic significance of impression cytology in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Citation
T. Sapci et al., Diagnostic significance of impression cytology in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, AM J RHINOL, 13(1), 1999, pp. 31-35
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY
ISSN journal
10506586 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
31 - 35
Database
ISI
SICI code
1050-6586(199901/02)13:1<31:DSOICI>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Impression Cytology (IC) is a noninvasive and easily repeated technique for investigating many pathologies of the conjunctiva such as dry eye, drug to xicities, and melanoma. In addition to skin tests and determination of seru m IgE levels, the presence of eosinophilia in the nasal mucosa and the conj unctiva is an important diagnostic factor in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Eosinophilia can classically be shown by the nasal smear technique as well as IC. The nasal smear is a difficult test to carry out and does not always give adequate results. With this in mind, we collected cells from the nasa l mucosa and superior palpebral conjunctiva from 27 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (17 female, IO male) using 5 X 5 mm, 0.22 mu m pore-siz ed cellulose acetate paper. The specimens were fixed in 95% alcohol and wer e then stained with hematoxylin eosin and periodic acid-Schiff stain for ex amination by light microscopy. Taking the free and intraepithelial eosinoph ilia into consideration, the specimens were grouped Of all patients, 92.6% and 85.2% had nasal and conjunctival eosinophilia, whereas 44.4% and 25.9% had nasal and conjunctival mononuclear cells, respectively. Our study has s hown that IC is a very reliable and practical technique that offers a valua ble alternative test for investigating both the intraepithelial and free eo sinophilia in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and other pathologies that cause cytologic changes.