L. Choudhury et al., Transmural myocardial blood flow distribution in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and effect of treatment, BAS R CARD, 94(1), 1999, pp. 49-59
Verapamil alleviates symptoms in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
(HCM), but the underlying mechanism of improvement remains speculative. Bas
eline and dipyridamole myocardial blood flow (MBF) were measured in 15 HCM
patients (14 men, 42 +/- 10 years), before and after 4 weeks of verapamil S
R 480 mg daily, using O-15 labelled water and positron emission tomography
(PET). Subendocardial (endo) and subepicardial (epi) MBF was measured in th
e septum (thickness 25.4 +/- 5.8 mm).
Pre-treatment baseline whole heart MBF was 1.02 +/- 0.28 ml/min/g and 1.01
+/- 0.30 ml/min/g on treatment (p = ns). Dipyridamole MBF was 1.39 +/- 0.31
ml/min/g off treatment and 1.23 +/- 0.34 ml/min/g on treatment (p = ns). C
oronary flow reserve (dipyridamole/resting MBF) was 1.45 +/- 0.52 and 1.30
+/- 0.51, respectively (p = ns). At baseline, the septal endo/epi MBF ratio
was uniform off and on treatment (1.13 +/- 0.18 vs 1.18 +/- 0.21, p = ns).
Before treatment, the endo/epi ratio following dipyridamole decreased to 0
.93 +/- 0.24 (p < 0.01 vs baseline) and 5/15 (33%) patients had a ratio < 0
.8 which would suggest subendocardial underperfusion. During treatment, the
endo/epi ratio following dipyridamole was no more different from baseline
(1.06 +/- 0.24, p = ns vs baseline) and 2/14 (14%) patients had an endo/epi
< 0.8.
PET can be successfully used to determine transmural MBF in vivo in patient
s with hypertrophied ventricles. Despite symptomatic improvement, high dose
verpamil therapy does not increase total MBF in patients with HCM but may
improve septal transmural MBF distribution during dipyridamole in some pati
ents.