COMPARISON OF HISTOLOGIC AND CYTOLOGIC SPECIMENS OF UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA WITH IMAGE-ANALYSIS - IMPLICATIONS FOR GRADING

Citation
Jd. Forte et al., COMPARISON OF HISTOLOGIC AND CYTOLOGIC SPECIMENS OF UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA WITH IMAGE-ANALYSIS - IMPLICATIONS FOR GRADING, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology, 19(2), 1997, pp. 158-166
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Cell Biology
ISSN journal
08846812
Volume
19
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
158 - 166
Database
ISI
SICI code
0884-6812(1997)19:2<158:COHACS>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare DNA results obtained by each of three preparatio n types (cytologic smears or cytocentrifuge samples, tissue sections a nd nuclei extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue) on patients with pr imary urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. STUDY DESIGN: Cases we re selected for study based on the histologic diagnosis and the availa bility of corresponding bladder washing cytologic specimens. Five-micr ometer sections and nuclear extracts were prepared from biopsies. DNA analysis was accomplished by use of an image cytometer on the Feulgen- stained material. RESULTS: DNA content results correlated with both hi stologic and cytologic grade. Using a binary classification system, bl adder washings and thin tissue section results concurred in 40/43 pati ents. Nuclear extracts were performed on 27 of the biopsies. The DNA c ontent determined by nuclear extract agreed with the tissue section re sults for all 27 biopsies. CONCLUSION: All three specimen preparations yield comparable DNA content results using a binary DNA classificatio n scheme (diploid or aneuploid). Histologic grading can be enhanced wi th DNA content results, particularly in the heterogeneous, grade 2 gro up of urothelial carcinomas.