Jd. Forte et al., COMPARISON OF HISTOLOGIC AND CYTOLOGIC SPECIMENS OF UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA WITH IMAGE-ANALYSIS - IMPLICATIONS FOR GRADING, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology, 19(2), 1997, pp. 158-166
OBJECTIVE: To compare DNA results obtained by each of three preparatio
n types (cytologic smears or cytocentrifuge samples, tissue sections a
nd nuclei extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue) on patients with pr
imary urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. STUDY DESIGN: Cases we
re selected for study based on the histologic diagnosis and the availa
bility of corresponding bladder washing cytologic specimens. Five-micr
ometer sections and nuclear extracts were prepared from biopsies. DNA
analysis was accomplished by use of an image cytometer on the Feulgen-
stained material. RESULTS: DNA content results correlated with both hi
stologic and cytologic grade. Using a binary classification system, bl
adder washings and thin tissue section results concurred in 40/43 pati
ents. Nuclear extracts were performed on 27 of the biopsies. The DNA c
ontent determined by nuclear extract agreed with the tissue section re
sults for all 27 biopsies. CONCLUSION: All three specimen preparations
yield comparable DNA content results using a binary DNA classificatio
n scheme (diploid or aneuploid). Histologic grading can be enhanced wi
th DNA content results, particularly in the heterogeneous, grade 2 gro
up of urothelial carcinomas.