D. Montaudon et al., DIFFERENTIAL STABILIZATION OF TOPOISOMERASE-II-DNA CLEAVABLE COMPLEXES BY DOXORUBICIN AND ETOPOSIDE IN DOXORUBICIN-RESISTANT RAT GLIOBLASTOMA CELLS, European journal of biochemistry, 245(2), 1997, pp. 307-315
Using the technique of alkaline filter elution, we have evaluated the
DNA damage induced by doxorubicin and etoposide in a rat glioblastoma
cell line, C6, and its doxorubicin-selected resistant variant, C6 0.5.
DNA damage paralleled drug-induced cytotoxicity, but it appeared that
the same DNA damage generated much less cytotoxicity in resistant cel
ls than in sensitive ones, resistant cells being able to tolerate more
DNA damage than sensitive cells. We have then quantified the doxorubi
cin- and etoposide-induced complexes between topoisomerase II (topoII)
DNA with the technique of SDS/KCl precipitation. Etoposide produced a
concentration-dependent increase in topoII-DNA complexes, which was h
igher in resistant cells at equitoxicity, just as was DNA damage. In c
ontrast, doxorubicin-induced topoII-DNA complexes, which were much les
s abundant than those induced by etoposide, were not differently produ
ced in sensitive and resistant cells. This indicates that the DNA dama
ge occurring in resistant cells at high doxorubicin concentrations mig
ht originate from source other than topoII-DNA complex formation. When
verapamil was added during drug exposure, it restored doxorubicin int
racellular accumulation to the level reached in sensitive cells, parti
ally reversed both doxorubicin and etoposide resistance, increased the
formation of etoposide-induced topoII-DNA complexes, but not those in
duced by doxorubicin. Immunoblot analysis of topoII as well as the mea
sure of its catalytic activity in nuclear extracts revealed a quantita
tive defect of this enzyme in the resistant line. When inhibiting this
activity by doxorubicin and etoposide, we observed that the concentra
tions of etoposide required for a given inhibition of kinetoplast DNA
decatenation are much higher that those of doxorubicin. The topoII ext
racted from both cell lines is, therefore, much more sensitive to doxo
rubicin than to etoposide, but no difference in drug sensitivity was e
vident between sensitive and resistant cells, indicating that no quali
tative alteration in topoII catalytic activity was likely to occur.