A prospective, randomized phase III trial comparing combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil with vinorelbine plus doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma
C. Blajman et al., A prospective, randomized phase III trial comparing combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil with vinorelbine plus doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma, CANCER, 85(5), 1999, pp. 1091-1097
BACKGROUND, A prospective, multicenter, randomized, Phase pi trial comparin
g the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin
, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) with a combination of vinorelbine and doxorubi
cin (NA) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast carcinoma was un
dertaken.
METHODS, One hundred and seventy-seven patients who previously were untreat
ed for recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma were entered into the study
; 7 patients could not be assessed. The final analysis relates to 85 patien
ts who were treated with FAC and 85 patients who were treated with NA, of w
hom 21 (25%) and 44 (52%), respectively, had received prior adjuvant chemot
herapy.
RESULTS. The overall response rates were similar for the two treatments and
were unaffected by prior exposure to adjuvant therapy; overall response ra
te (ORR) for FAC was 74% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 65-83%), and th
e ORR for NA was 75% (95% CI, 66-84%). The activity of NA in patients with
liver involvement was greater than that of FAC in terms of survival. Overal
l survivals were similar, with a median of 17.3 months for patients receivi
ng FAC and 17.8 months for patients receiving NA. Severe toxicity was uncom
mon with World Health Organization Grade 3-4 neutropenia affecting only 7%
of patients in each arm of the study. NA was associated with a higher incid
ence of mild to moderate constipation, neurotoxicity, and phlebitis, wherea
s FAC produced a slight excess of mild cardiotoxicity.
CONCLUSIONS. The efficacy of these two regimens is very similar, although N
A may be more active in a subset of patients with visceral metastatic disea
se, particularly liver involvement. It is clear that, in a direct compariso
n with an established three-drug regimen, the newer two-drug combination of
NA demonstrated equivalent activity with no significant excess of Grade 3-
4 toxicity. Cancer 1999;85:1091-7. (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.