When players have identical time preferences, the set of feasible repeated
game payoffs coincides with the convex hull of the underlying stage-game pa
yoffs. Moreover, all feasible and individually rational payoffs can be sust
ained by equilibria if the players are sufficiently patient. Neither of the
se facts generalizes to the case of different time preferences. First, play
ers can mutually benefit from trading payoffs across time. Hence, the set o
f feasible repeated game payoffs is typically larger than the convex hull o
f the underlying stage-game payoffs. Second, it is not usually the case tha
t every trade plan that guarantees individually rational payoffs can be sus
tained by an equilibrium, no matter how patient the players are. This paper
provides a simple characterization of the sets of Nash and of subgame perf
ect equilibrium payoffs in two-player repeated games.