Purpose: To determine the neuroprotective effects of halothane during const
ant stimulation of the perforant path.
Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats had electrodes implanted into the perfora
nt path and dentate granule cell layer under halothane anaesthesia (1-2% in
oxygen). They were then divided into four groups. In group 1 (n = 9), the
perforant path was stimulated at 20 Hz for 2 h under halothane anaesthesia
(1-2%). In group 2 (n = 3), the animals were unstimulated but maintained un
der halothane anaesthesia (1-2%) for 2 h with the electrodes in place. Both
groups 1 and 2 had the electrodes removed and were then allowed to recover
fully from the anaesthetic. In groups 3 and 4, the electrodes were held in
place with dental acrylic. Both of these groups were allowed to re cover f
ully from anaesthesia. In group 3 (n = 3), 24-48 h after recovery from anae
sthesia, the perforant path was stimulated at 20 Hz for 2 h. Group 4 (n = 3
) received no stimulation. After 14-17 days, the rats were killed, and morp
hometry and cell counts were performed on the hippocampi from rats in group
s 1 and 2.
Results: Cell densities were not significantly different beta een control (
group 2), unstimulated rats, and animals stimulated under halothane anaesth
esia (group 1). Stimulation in the unanaesthetised rats resulted in severe
neuronal loss in hilus, CA1, and CA3.
Conclusions: Halothane protects hippocampal neurons against damage induced
by constant stimulation of the perforant path.