Valerie Mike's proposal of an "ethics of evidence" is an interesting, impor
tant venture into a little explored field. Mike's two rules (use the best p
ossible knowledge and acknowledge uncertainty) have been implicit but need
to become explicit in a world where information and knowledge have enormous
power-especially in medical practice and research, where evidence is essen
tial to clinical decisions, policy formulation, and dissemination of result
s. A fully developed ethics of evidence would depend on a still underdevelo
ped theory of evidence, that is, on some conception of the nature of eviden
ce, the logic of its use and the epistemology of discovery and explanation.
Until such a groundwork is developed, practical guidelines are deducible i
n the ethics of data collection and dissemination. This article examines th
ose ethics, suggesting criteria for the morally responsible treatment of ev
idence collection, dissemination, and use.