Monocotylid monogeneans inhabit a wide diversity of sites on their chondric
hthyan hosts including the skin, Sills, nasal fossae, urogenital system and
coelom. The large variation in the morphology of the haptor appears to ref
lect this diversity in attachment sites. We demonstrate that the complexity
of the haptor can be related to the habitat of the parasite. Generally, th
ose parasites which live in habitats subject to strong water currents such
as the gills and dorsal skin surface have more complex haptors than those i
n environments exposed to weaker or no water currents including the nasal f
ossae, urogenital system and body cavity. However, there can be considerabl
e variation in haptoral components, even among congeners, living on the 'gi
lls' of their hosts. The microhabitat was determined for Monocotyle helicop
hallus and M. spiremae, both from the gills of the pink whipray, Himantura
fai, and M. corali from the gills of the cowtail ray, Pastinachus sephen. W
e demonstrate that differences in the morphology of the hamuli and the numb
er and morphology of septal sclerites and marginal papillae among these spe
cies of Monocotyle can be related directly to their microhabitat. It also a
ppears that different haptoral structures are important for attachment to t
he host at different stages in the development of the parasite, based on st
udies on the development and distribution of Neoheterocotyle rhinobatidis f
rom the gills of the common shovelnose ray Rhinobatos typus.