Purpose: To demonstrate the potential for transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to
predict pubic arch interference of transperineal needle placement for prost
ate brachytherapy,
Methods and Materials: TRUS and pelvic computerized tomography (CT) scans f
rom 22 patients who had transperineal prostate brachytherapy at University
of Washington were analyzed for pubic arch visualization and interference.
The outer margins of the prostate and the inner margins of the pubic bones
from each imaging modality were outlined and compared.
Results: The pubic arch was readily visualized by TRUS in 21 of the 22 pati
ents. There was good correlation between TRUS and CT for evaluating the amo
unt of pubic arch interference (r = 0.90).
Conclusion: TRUS can be substituted for CT imaging to evaluate pubic arch i
nterference of transperineal needle placement for prostate brachytherapy, E
liminating routine CT scanning would reduce the cost of treatment. (C) 1999
Elsevier Science Inc.