Automated treatment planning engine for prostate seed implant brachytherapy

Citation
Y. Yu et al., Automated treatment planning engine for prostate seed implant brachytherapy, INT J RAD O, 43(3), 1999, pp. 647-652
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
ISSN journal
03603016 → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
647 - 652
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(19990201)43:3<647:ATPEFP>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a computer-intelligent planning engine for automated tr eatment planning and optimization of ultrasound- and template-guided prosta te seed implants. Methods and Materials: The genetic algorithm was modified to reflect the 2D nature of the implantation template. A multi-objective decision scheme was used to rank competing solutions, taking into account dose uniformity and conformity to the planning target volume (PTV), dose-sparing of the urethra and the rectum, and the sensitivity of the resulting dosimetry to seed mis placement. Optimized treatment plans were evaluated using selected dosimetr ic quantifiers, dose-volume histogram (DVH), and sensitivity analysis based on simulated seed placement errors. These dosimetric planning components w ere integrated into the Prostate Implant Planning Engine for Radiotherapy ( PIPER). Results: PIPER has been used to produce a variety of plans for prostate see d implants. In general, maximization of the minimum peripheral dose (mPD) f or given implanted total source strength tended to produce peripherally wei ghted seed patterns. Minimization of the urethral dose further reduced the loading in the central region of the PTV. Isodose conformity to the PTV was achieved when the set of objectives did not reflect seed positioning uncer tainties; the corresponding optimal plan generally required fewer seeds and higher source strength per seed compared to the manual planning experience . When seed placement uncertainties were introduced into the set of treatme nt planning objectives, the optimal plan tended to reach a compromise betwe en the preplanned outcome and the likelihood of retaining the preferred out come after implantation. The reduction in the volatility of such seed confi gurations optimized under uncertainty was verified by sensitivity studies. Conclusion: An automated treatment planning engine incorporating real-time sensitivity analysis was found to be a useful tool in dosimetric planning f or prostate brachytherapy. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.