RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors sought to evaluate prospectively magn
etic resonance angiography (MRA) versus fistulography in the detection and
characterization of complications associated with malfunctioning hemodialys
is access fistulas (arteriovenous fistulas [AVF]).
METHODS. Nineteen patients with clinical AVF dysfunction were studied by MR
A and fistulography, Data front each study were collected prospectively and
analyzed in a blinded manner.
RESULTS. The main diagnosis was stenosis in eight patients, thrombosis in f
ive patients (mural thrombosis with preserved flow in one), aneurysm withou
t stenosis in tno patients, and normal AVF in four patients. A hazy flow vo
id, assumed to be related to turbulence, was observed in normal arterial an
astomoses, When Row void was considered as a criterion of stenosis or throm
bosis, one false-positive and one false-negative MRA study were determined,
yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 86%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS. Magnetic resonance angiography is a feasible and sensitive tec
hnique with which to portray suspected malfunctioning hemodialysis access f
istulas.