A comparison of methods for detecting bacteria in root canal exudate
Citation
M. Noda et al., A comparison of methods for detecting bacteria in root canal exudate, J ENDODONT, 25(3), 1999, pp. 187-189
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
SICI code
0099-2399(199903)25:3<187:ACOMFD>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
This study compared the ability of bacterial detection from intracanal exud
ate by two different methods. One is a conventional method (i.e. the sample
s were transported into anaerobic chambers immediately after sampling and t
hen moved to an outside laboratory for identification of bacteria). Another
is a preculture method (i.e, the samples were inoculated into semisolid me
dium immediately after sampling, incubated for 24 h under anaerobic conditi
ons, and then moved to the laboratory for bacterial identification). In 22
cases, the preculture method detected bacteria in 18 of 22 cases, whereas t
he conventional method detected bacteria in 6 of 22 cases. The preculture m
ethod showed significantly higher frequency of bacterial detection (p = 0.0
003). Gram-positive cocci (alpha-Streptococcus, Enterococcus, etc.) were de
tected in many cases. These results suggested that the preculture method co
uld be helpful in detecting root canal bacteria and enhance antibiotic trea
tment of endodontic disease.