Smallest detectable difference in radiological progression

Citation
M. Lassere et al., Smallest detectable difference in radiological progression, J RHEUMATOL, 26(3), 1999, pp. 731-739
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology,"da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
0315162X → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
731 - 739
Database
ISI
SICI code
0315-162X(199903)26:3<731:SDDIRP>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
OMERACT IV started a discussion on the development of radiological response criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Such criteria depend on the definit ion of what constitutes the minimum clinically important progression of dam age. Because such a definition is currently not available, as a first step we have used the concept of random measurement error to determine what is t he smallest detectable difference (SDD) in radiological progression between 2 radiographs of a particular patient. Baseline and 12 month radiographs ( hands, wrists, feet) of 52 patients representative of the spectrum of radio logical progression were selected from a randomized controlled trial of ear ly rheumatoid arthritis (COBRA study) and were read paired and chronologica lly by 2 observers using the van der Heijde modified Sharp method (0-448 sc ale) and another 2 observers using the Scott modified Larsen method (0-200) . The measurement error of progression was determined using the metric 95% limits of agreement method of Bland and Altman, In the setting of early RA the SDD is 11 modified Sharp score units and 8 modified Larsen score units if there is an equal distribution of baseline damage and progression in the sample and the mean score of the same trained observers is always used. Th e SDD is 15.5 modified Sharp score units and 11 modified Larsen score units if there is an equal distribution of baseline damage and progression in th e sample and the mean score of any 2 trained observers is used. Other SDD w ere determined depending on the context of measurement. Although this exerc ise needs repetition in other settings, the SDD is a useful starting point in the development of radiological response criteria.