Postoperative liver failure after major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with special reference to remnant liver volume

Citation
K. Shirabe et al., Postoperative liver failure after major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with special reference to remnant liver volume, J AM COLL S, 188(3), 1999, pp. 304-309
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
ISSN journal
10727515 → ACNP
Volume
188
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
304 - 309
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-7515(199903)188:3<304:PLFAMH>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Background: postoperative liver failure is a life-threatening complication after hepatic resection. Because of recent advances in liver surgery techni que and a more stringent patient selection, mortality after hepatic resecti on has steadily decreased, but its incidence still ranges from 10% to 20%. The factors linked to postoperative liver failure in major hepatic resectio n in the modern era should be reevaluated. Study Design: Of 80 patients with viral markers (hepatitis C viral antibody or hepatitis B surface antigen) who underwent major hepatic resections (no less than bisegmentectomies) for hepatocellular carcinoma between 1990 and 1996, 7 patients (8.8%) died of postoperative liver failure within 6 month s after hepatectomy. The cause of liver failure was analyzed based on both the preoperative data and the intraoperative findings. In addition, since a ll the patients who died of liver failure underwent a right hepatic lobecto my, a further data analysis was also done in 47 patients who underwent a ri ght lobectomy of the liver. A volumetric analysis by CT was then done to ev aluate the remnant liver volume. Results: Between the patients with liver failure and those without liver fa ilure who underwent a right lobectomy, there were no significant difference s in preoperative data or intraoperative findings. Volumetric analysis reve aled that the remnant liver volume of patients who died of liver failure wa s significantly smaller than that of patients who lived (p = 0.008). The in cidence of liver failure in patients with a remnant liver volume of less th an 250 mL/m(2) was 7 of 20 (38%), while it was 0 of 27 in patients with a l iver volume of no less than 250 mL/m(2) (p = 0.0012). The only significant risk factor for liver failure in patients with a remnant liver volume of le ss than 250 mL/m(2) was diabetes mellitus (p = 0.0072). Conclusions: The expected remnant liver volume appears to be a good predict or for liver failure in patients who undergo a right lobectomy of the liver . In patients with diabetes mellitus and an expected remnant liver volume o f less than 250 mL/m(2), a major hepatectomy should be avoided. Careful pat ient selection based on volumetric analysis in major hepatectomy cases coul d help prevent the occurrence of postoperative liver failure. (J Am Coil Su rg 1999;188:304-307. (C) 1999 by the American College of Surgeons).