Conditioned inhibition is a fundamental component of contemporary learning
theory. Our selective review of the literature defines the term conditioned
inhibition on three levels-operational, behavioral, and theoretical-in ord
er to evaluate the utility of the construct. Although consensus definitions
are found at the operational and behavioral levels, the principal disagree
ment exists, not surprisingly, at the theoretical level. The comparator hyp
othesis suggests that the concept of inhibition is superfluous because beha
vior that is indicative of inhibition can be explained more parsimoniously
by noninhibitory theoretical mechanisms. Furthermore, the findings that inh
ibition is less pervasive than and not always mutually exclusive with excit
ation suggest that the original view of inhibition as the opposite of condi
tioned excitation is no longer viable. However, rejection of the original c
onception of inhibition does not invalidate the theoretical utility of inhi
bition as a construct in other paradigms (e.g., occasion setting). (C) 1999
Academic Press.