Two questions about the relationship between arousal and memory were invest
igated: First, does the source of arousal influence memory, and, second, wh
at impact does arousal have on memory for detail? In Experiment 1, physiolo
gical arousal (running or not running in place) was factorially combined wi
th emotional arousal (viewing a neutral or an emotional slide sequence). Re
cognition memory was tested for gist, central detail, and background detail
. Experiments 2 and 3 were similar to Experiment 1, with the exception that
a cued recall task was used in Experiment 2 and physiological arousal was
manipulated with stationary biking in Experiment 3. The results of these ex
periments indicated that physiological arousal had little impact on memory
and that emotional arousal led to improvements in memory for both central a
nd background detail. Overall, these results supported the notions that the
source of arousal is an important determinant of an event's memorability (
Christianson, 1992a) and that emotional arousal serves to enhance the scope
of memory (i.e., flashbulb memory; Brown & Kulik, 1977).