Glomerulomegaly in Australian Aborigines

Citation
Jf. Bertram et al., Glomerulomegaly in Australian Aborigines, NEPHROLOGY, 4, 1998, pp. S46-S53
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
NEPHROLOGY
ISSN journal
13205358 → ACNP
Volume
4
Year of publication
1998
Supplement
S
Pages
S46 - S53
Database
ISI
SICI code
1320-5358(199811)4:<S46:GIAA>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Idiopathic glomerular enlargement. has previously been described in a numbe r of indigenous populations, including Australian Aborigines. This study ha d three aims: (1) evaluate three methods for estimating mean glomerular tuf t and renal corpuscle volume; (2) assess the effects of fixation on glomeru lar dimensions; and (3) estimate glomerular tuft and renal corpuscle volume in clinical biopsies from Australian non-Aboriginals, Aboriginals and Abor iginal inhabitants of the Tiwi Islands (Bathurst Island and Melville Island , Northern Territory, Australia). First, glomerular volume was determined i n initial transplant biopsies from 17 non-Aboriginal males (30-50 years) us ing three methods: the Cavalieri method, a stereological method that requir es serial sectioning of glomeruli and knowledge of section thickness, but r equires no knowledge or assumptions of glomerular size or shape (the gold-s tandard method); the stereological method of Weibel and Gomez that employs a single section but requires assumptions of glomerular size distribution a nd shape; and the maximal profile method, with which the largest glomerular profile in a single section is identified, and used to calculate the volum e of the parent glomerulus (assuming glomerular sphericity). Estimates for glomerular tuft volume were (mean +/- SD): Cavalieri method (2.08 +/- 0.37 X 10(6) mu m(3)); Weibel and Gomez (2.55 +/- 0.63 X 10(6) mu m(3)); maximal profile method (3.09 +/- 0.6610(6) mu m(3)). Taking the Cavalieri estimate to be accurate, the maximal profile method is seen to grossly overestimate mean glomerular tuft volume, whereas the Weibel and Gomez method overestim ated tuft volume by 23%. Both methods considerably overestimated mean renal corpuscle volume. In the study of fixation and glomerular dimensions, we f ound that glomeruli in clinical biopsies fixed in formalin were larger (47% for glomerular tuft and 25% for renal corpuscle) than the glomeruli in bio psies fixed in formol mercury/Dubosq Brazil. This result emphasizes the imp ortance of standardizing the histological technique in quantitative studies of glomeruli. Finally, the Weibel and Gomez method was used to estimate me an glomerular volume in formalin-fixed clinical biopsies from 80 non-Aborig inal Australians, 78 non-Tiwi Aboriginals and 72 Tiwi Aboriginals. Mean glo merular tuft volumes were: 3.12 +/- 1.46 X 10(6) mu m(3), 4.91 +/- 2.59 X 1 0(6) mu m(3) and 4.79 +/- 2.08 X 10(6) mu m(3), respectively, (for biopsies with four or more profiles). Mean glomerular tuft volume in the two Aborig inal populations was significantly (P < 0.001 in each case) greater than th at in the non-Aboriginals. These data indicate that there is pronounced glo merulomegaly in Australian Aborigines.