Effects of calcium-channel blockade in older patients with diabetes and systolic hypertension

Citation
J. Tuomilehto et al., Effects of calcium-channel blockade in older patients with diabetes and systolic hypertension, N ENG J MED, 340(9), 1999, pp. 677-684
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00284793 → ACNP
Volume
340
Issue
9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
677 - 684
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-4793(19990304)340:9<677:EOCBIO>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background Recent reports suggest that calcium-channel blockers may be harm ful in patients with diabetes and hypertension. We previously reported that antihypertensive treatment with the calcium-channel blocker nitrendipine r educed the risk of cardiovascular events. In this post hoc analysis, we com pared the outcome of treatment with nitrendipine in diabetic and nondiabeti c patients. Methods After stratification according to center, sex, and presence or abse nce of previous cardiovascular complications, 4695 patients (age, greater t han or equal to 60 years) with systolic blood pressure of 160 to 219 mm Hg and diastolic pressure below 95 mm Hg were randomly assigned to receive act ive treatment or placebo. Active treatment consisted of nitrendipine (10 to 40 mg per day) with the possible addition or substitution of enalapril (5 to 20 mg per day) or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 25 mg per day) or both, t itrated to reduce the systolic blood pressure by at least 20 mm Hg and to l ess than 150 mm Hg. In the control group, matching placebo tablets were adm inistered similarly. Results At randomization, 492 patients (10.5 percent) had diabetes. After a median follow-up of two years, the systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the placebo and active-treatment groups differed by 8.6 and 3.9 mm Hg, r espectively, among the diabetic patients. Among the 4203 patients without d iabetes, systolic and diastolic pressures differed by 10.3 and 4.5 mm Hg, r espectively, in the two groups. After adjustment for possible confounders, active treatment was found to have reduced overall mortality by 55 percent (from 45.1 deaths per 1000 patients to 26.4 deaths per 1000 patients), mort ality from cardiovascular disease by 76 percent, all cardiovascular events combined by 69 percent, fatal and nonfatal strokes by 73 percent, and all c ardiac events combined by 63 percent in the group of patients with diabetes . Among the nondiabetic patients, active treatment decreased all cardiovasc ular events combined by 26 percent and fatal and nonfatal strokes by 38 per cent. In the group of patients receiving active treatment, reductions in ov erall mortality, mortality from cardiovascular disease, and all cardiovascu lar events were significantly larger among the diabetic patients than among the nondiabetic patients (P=0.04, P=0.02, and P=0.01, respectively). Conclusions Nitrendipine-based antihypertensive therapy is particularly ben eficial in older patients with diabetes and isolated systolic hypertension. Thus, our findings do not support the hypothesis that the use of long-acti ng calcium-channel blockers may be harmful in diabetic patients. (N Engl J Med 1999;340:677-84) (C) 1999, Massachusetts Medical Society.