SEQUENCES IN THE LIGAND-BINDING DOMAINS OF THE HUMAN ANDROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTORS WHICH DETERMINE THEIR DISTINCT LIGAND IDENTITIES

Citation
V. Vivat et al., SEQUENCES IN THE LIGAND-BINDING DOMAINS OF THE HUMAN ANDROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTORS WHICH DETERMINE THEIR DISTINCT LIGAND IDENTITIES, Journal of molecular endocrinology, 18(2), 1997, pp. 147-160
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
ISSN journal
09525041
Volume
18
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
147 - 160
Database
ISI
SICI code
0952-5041(1997)18:2<147:SITLDO>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
The natural ligands of the progesterone (PR) and androgen (AR) recepto rs, progesterone and testosterone, differ only by their 17 beta-substi tution. To identify within the AR and PR ligand-binding domains (LBDs) the sequences responsible for the differential recognition of these l igands, chimeric LBDs assembled from five homologous AR/PR 'cassettes' linked to the GAL4-DNA binding domain were constructed, and their lig and binding and transactivation characteristics were determined. Repla cing the central cassette 3 of PR by that of AR generated a progestero ne- and testosterone-responsive PR LED with the AR residues 788-RHLS-7 91 being specifically involved in testosterone recognition, while the introduction of the C-terminal PR cassette 5 into AR conferred progest in responsiveness onto the AR LED. These results suggest that residues within AR 788-RHLS-791 interact with the testosterone 17 beta-OH, whi le PR cassette 5 apparently contains the amino acid(s) specifically in volved in the recognition of the progesterone 17 beta-acetyl group. Ho wever, ligand binding and transactivation by these chimeras were signi ficantly decreased compared with those of the parental LBDs, indicatin g that residues located outside of these cassettes contribute to the p roper positioning of the steroids in the AR and PR ligand-binding Dock ets (LBPs). Indeed, certain AR/PR chimeras acquired efficient ligand b inding, but were unable to transactivate, indicating that the ligand w as improperly bound in the chimeric LBP and could not induce the confo rmational changes leading to a transcriptionally competent activation function (AF-2) within the LED. The properties of the various LED chim eras are discussed in view of the recently solved three-dimensional st ructures of the retinoid X receptor alpha apo- and retinoic acid recep tor gamma holo-LBDs.