The effect of dust lead control on blood lead in toddlers: A randomized trial

Citation
Gg. Rhoads et al., The effect of dust lead control on blood lead in toddlers: A randomized trial, PEDIATRICS, 103(3), 1999, pp. 551-555
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
PEDIATRICS
ISSN journal
00314005 → ACNP
Volume
103
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
551 - 555
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-4005(199903)103:3<551:TEODLC>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Background. Contaminated household dust is believed to be a major source of exposure for most children with elevated blood lead levels. To determine i f a vigorous dust clean-up effort would reduce this exposure we conducted a randomized controlled field trial. Methods. We randomized 113 urban children between the ages of 6 and 36 mont hs: 56 children to a lead dust intervention composed of maternal education and biweekly assistance with household cleaning and 57 children to a contro l group. Household cleaning was done by two trained lay workers who focused their efforts on wet mopping of floors, damp-sponging of walls and horizon tal surfaces, and vacuuming with a high-efficiency particle accumulating va cuum. Household dust lead levels, child blood lead levels, and maternal kno wledge of lead poisoning and sources of exposure were measured before and a fter the intervention. Results. Ninety-nine children were successfully followed for 12 +/- 3 month s: 46 children in the lead group and 53 children in the control group. Age and blood lead were similar in the two groups at baseline and averaged 20 m onths and 12.0 mu g/dL, respectively. Blood lead fell 17% in the interventi on group and did not change among controls. Household dust and dust lead me asures also fell significantly in the intervention group. Children in homes cleaned 20 or more times throughout the year had an average blood lead red uction of 34%. Conclusions. Regular home cleaning, accompanied by maternal education, is a safe and partially effective intervention that should be recommended for t he large majority of lead-exposed children for whom, unfortunately, removal to lead-safe housing is not an option.