Ls. Porter et Aa. Stone, ARE THERE REALLY GENDER DIFFERENCES IN COPING - A RECONSIDERATION OF PREVIOUS DATA AND RESULTS FROM A DAILY STUDY, Journal of social and clinical psychology, 14(2), 1995, pp. 184-202
Tested the hypothesis that there are differences in the way men and wo
men experience daily problems and in the coping strategies they use to
handle them with longitudinal daily data. Previous studies have concl
uded that men use more instrumental, active coping while women tend to
wards more emotion-focused coping. These studies are limited because t
hey did not consider the kinds of problems experienced or the subjects
' psychological reaction (appraisal) to these problems, and because th
ey used retrospective, summary measures of coping. in the present stud
y, 156 men and women residing in the community completed dal ly questi
onnaire booklets that included items assessing stress and coping. Subj
ects were asked to describe the most bothersome problem of the day and
answer questions concerning its severity, chronicity, the control tha
t they had over its occurrence, and which of nine strategies they had
used in handling the problem. Problems were coded into eight categorie
s according to their content. Women reported more problems focused on
the self, parenting problems, and problems with other people than men;
men reported more work-related problems and more miscellaneous proble
ms than women. Gender differences in appraisal and coping were minimal
. Women appraised problems focused on the self as more chronic than me
n did, and men used more direct action than women in dealing with work
problems. These findings contradict previous findings of gender diffe
rences in coping, and challenge the popular notion that men use more i
nstrumental coping than women while women use more emotion-focused cop
ing and social support.