Mf. Ehrlich et al., Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring, READ WRIT, 11(1), 1999, pp. 29-63
This experiment investigated metacognitive monitoring in the processing of
anaphors in 10-year-old skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Two tasks w
ere used with expository texts. The direct self-evaluation task was carried
out with consistent texts in which target anaphors were either repeated no
un phrases or pronouns. Subjects had to read and to evaluate their own comp
rehension on a 6-point scale. After reading, subjects answered multiple-cho
ice questions designed to test the processing of anaphors. In the inconsist
ency detection task, target anaphors were either repeated noun phrases or i
nconsistent noun phrases. Subjects had to read and detect inconsistencies.
After reading, they answered multiple-choice questions. In both tasks, on-l
ine measures (reading times for units containing target anaphors and for su
bsequent units, and look-backs) were collected in addition to off-line meas
ures (ratings of comprehension, detection of inconsistencies and response t
o multiple-choice questions) in order to analyse indicators of implicit and
explicit evaluation and revision activities. The results from the two task
s converged: less skilled comprehenders showed deficiencies in monitoring o
n measures of implicit and explicit evaluation and revision. Patterns of re
ading times revealed that less skilled comprehenders were sensitive to the
difficulties in processing pronouns in the self-evaluation task and also se
nsitive to the lack of text cohesion in the inconsistency detection task. H
owever, this sensitivity was weak and unable to trigger explicit activities
. These results were interpreted in the framework of Karmiloff-Smith's (198
6) model.