In re-examining May's law of curvilinear disparity, this article analyzes t
he structure of opinion of political parties. May suggests that voters, par
ty readers and party activists have different incentives to participate in
politics, and therefore voters and leaders have more moderate positions on
issues than party activists. This article is based on the extensions of May
's law made by Kitschelt, who argues that curvilinear disparities, although
not general phenomena, are bound to occur in specific circumstances. We ha
ve focused on the level of cleavage conflict in the system, the variable th
at Kitschelt himself found to be critical for explaining party radicalism a
mong sub-leaders. Using the Norwegian multiparty system as a test case, we
propose that radicalism among party activists is conditioned by the relativ
e saliency of different policy dimensions. The empirical analysis, which is
based on surveys of MPs, party members and voters in connection with the g
eneral election of 1993, gives very little support to our proposition.