The aim of this study was to assess, whether or not, visual grading of chan
ges in subject acceleration during force plate collection within a fixed. m
easured velocity range was adequate to control acceleration/deceleration. a
second question was, whether or not, visual grading of the trials was adeq
uate to prevent significant changes in ground reaction forces within a cont
rolled velocity range. Eight healthy, non-chondrodysplastic dogs, of varyin
g breeds, were used in the study. Each dog was tested in four different pro
tocols. The order in which the dogs completed the different protocols was d
etermined randomly. During all of the protocols, the dogs trotted across th
e measured testing area within a velocity range of 1.6 to 1.9 m/s. The prot
ocols varied in the amount of acceleration or deceleration allowed in the t
esting area and the methods of evaluating the acceleration or deceleration.
Significant differences in ground reaction force measurements were found,
with variations in the acceleration and deceleration. The majority of chang
es were found in the craniocaudal axis during acceleration and deceleration
. Vertical axis measurements were only altered in the rear limbs. Significa
nt differences were not found in any measurement (except the: stance phase
duration in the rear limb) between the mechanically controlled minimal acce
leration/deceleration variation protocol and the visually controlled accele
ration/deceleration variation protocol. While visual observation was unable
to consistently differentiate acceleration, or deceleration, changes throu
gh the testing area, it was able to eliminate enough variation in ground re
action force measurements so that differences were not found between the me
chanically controlled minimal acceleration/deceleration variation protocol
nor the visually controlled acceleration/deceleration variation protocol. T
hese results suggest that either method of collection may be acceptable for
data collection depending upon the type of study bring performed.