Background: Aspirin is widely used for cardiovascular prophylaxis.
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of two widely-used strategies-dose reduct
ion and enteric coating-for the minimization of gastric mucosal injury or t
oxicity.
Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers were studied. On four separate occasions
each received, under blinded conditions, five daily doses of plain aspirin
300 mg, plain aspirin 75 mg, enteric-coated aspirin 300 mg or placebo. Ex
vivo prostaglandin Ex synthesis was stimulated by the vortex mixing of gast
ric mucosal biopsies in Tris saline and measured by radioimmunoassay. Mucos
al injury was quantified both by counting erosions and with a visual analog
ue scale.
Results: All three preparations reduced prostaglandin E-2 synthesis by day
five, by (median) 84% for plain aspirin 300 mg, by 80% for enteric coated a
spirin 300 mg and by 63% for plain aspirin 75 mg. There was little mucosal
injury prior to the start of each dose and period and no significant change
with placebo, Plain aspirin caused a dose-dependent mucosal injury, with t
wo (median, IQR 0-7) gastric erosions after five days of plain aspirin 75 m
g, and 18 (2-26) after five days of plain aspirin 300 mg. With enteric-coat
ed aspirin 300 mg there were 0 (0-1) gastric erosions (P = 0.003 compared t
o plain aspirin 300 mg P = 0.11, compared to plain aspirin 75 mg).
Conclusion: Enteric coated aspirin reduces acute gastric mucosal injury to
placebo levels, despite its inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. Enteric
coating is an appropriate strategy for the prevention of gastric mucosal da
mage induced by low-dose aspirin, which warrants systematic clinical evalua
tion.