Objective: The practice patterns of international medical graduate (IMG) an
d U.S. medical graduate (USMG) psychiatrists were compared. Method: Using d
ata from the 1996 National Survey of Psychiatric Practice, the authors comp
ared IMGs and USMGs in terms of demographic characteristics, practice setti
ngs, patients' clinical characteristics, and sources of reimbursement. Resu
lts: The IMGs surveyed tended to be older than USMGs, included a higher pro
portion of women, and were more racially heterogeneous. They worked longer
hours, worked more frequently in the public sector, and treated a higher pr
oportion of patients with psychotic disorders. The IMGs also received a hig
her percentage of their income than USMGs from Medicaid and Medicare, where
as the reverse was true of self-payment. Most of these differences remained
significant after psychiatrist's age, gender, race, board certification, a
nd work setting were controlled for. Conclusions: IMG and USMG psychiatrist
s have different practice patterns. Policies that substantially decrease th
e number of IMG, psychiatrists may adversely affect the availability of psy
chiatrists to treat minorities and other underserved populations.