Dw. Kaplan et al., A comparison study of an elementary school-based health center - Effects on health care access and use, ARCH PED AD, 153(3), 1999, pp. 235-243
Objective: To assess the effects of an elementary school-based health cente
r (SBHC) on access to and the use of physical and mental health services by
children aged 4 to 13 years.
Study Design: A retrospective cohort analysis of parent surveys from a comp
arable intervention (SBHC) and a comparison of urban elementary schools.
Intervention: Elementary SBHC services, including preventive physical healt
h care; the care of minor short-term illnesses, injuries, and stable ongoin
g medical conditions; dental screenings; and mental health counseling.
Participants: All parents of students at both schools were asked to complet
e a survey. Return rates on the survey were 78.3% (570/728) and 77.0% (440/
571) at the intervention and comparison schools, respectively.
Main Outcome Measures: The use of health services, access to health service
s, and health service satisfaction.
Results: Compared with respondents at comparison schools, respondents whose
children had access to an SBHC had less difficulty (P =.01) receiving phys
ical health care for their children, ie, treatment of illnesses and injurie
s, immunizations, and physical examinations (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confiden
ce interval, 0.48-0.91). Access to an SBHC was independently and significan
tly related to less emergency department use (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confide
nce interval, 0.40-0.99; P<.05), a greater likelihood of having had a physi
cian's visit since the school year began (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence
interval, 1.39-2.65; P<.01), and a greater likelihood of having had an annu
al dental examination (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.83
; P<.05). Measured by a 12-item scale, respondents who reported the SBHC as
their most-used health service were significantly more satisfied with thei
r service than respondents who mostly used community clinics (z = -5.21; P<
.01) or hospital clinics (z = -4.03; P<.01).
Conclusions: Independent of insurance status and other confounding variable
s, underserved minority children with SBHC access have better health care a
ccess and use than children without SBHC access, signifying that SBHCs can
be an effective component of health delivery systems for these children.