Background: Familial systemic sclerosis has been rarely reported. Assumptio
ns have therefore been made implying no familial disease aggregation. This
study critically challenges the assumption using a methodical population-ba
sed epidemiological approach to quantify the prevalence and characteristics
of familial systemic sclerosis.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study the systemic sclerosis prevalen
ce in first degree family members was compared between 715 systemic scleros
is patients (710 families) and 371 randomly ascertained age and gender grou
p-matched general practice controls (371 families). These data, obtained by
telephone questionnaire (living patients) or medical records review (decea
sed patients and untraceable patients of unknown living status), were valid
ated, where necessary, and expressed in terms of relative risk, absolute ri
sk and population point prevalence.
Results: Systemic sclerosis affecting first degree members was validated in
ten of 710 families. Reporting of systemic disease in another four more di
stant family members, and the co-occurrence of systemic and localised disea
se in three families was also documented.
Observed and expected disease subtype concordance was 80% (44-97%) and 68%
respectively and the female predominance among familial cases was similar t
o that for non-familial disease. The risk of disease in a subsequent first
degree relative was compared to the risk in an initial first degree family
member. Its estimated magnitude was wide (11-158). However, use of populati
on prevalence data to determine the expected number of systemic sclerosis p
atients in the negative cohorts' families suggests the higher estimate is m
ore realistic. Despite the high magnitude, the absolute disease risk in fir
st degree family members remained low - approximating 1%. The population pr
evalence of familial systemic sclerosis approximated 1.4/million.
Conclusions: This study substantially increases the otherwise small list of
documented instances of familial systemic sclerosis. More importantly, it
quantifies the risk for the first time, ranking it as the disease's most po
werful determinant identified to date.