Contamination susceptibility of three needleless and one standard needle injection systems

Authors
Citation
Amh. Ho et E. Ling, Contamination susceptibility of three needleless and one standard needle injection systems, CAN J ANAES, 46(3), 1999, pp. 290-293
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE
ISSN journal
0832610X → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
290 - 293
Database
ISI
SICI code
0832-610X(199903)46:3<290:CSOTNA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Purpose: To compare in vitro the contamination susceptibility of three need leless and one standard needle injection systems, Methods: The Baxter inter link, St. Paul Medical Key-Lok, Braun SafSite, and Becton Dickinson heparin lock, were com pared. Fifty of each were studied. Each system was connected to a culture b ottle and injected 30 times over 72 hr. The manufacturers' directions were followed except for Braun's,which rec ommend that a new sterile cap be used after each injection. Instead, the same cap was used after each injection to reflect day-to-day clinical practice. Culture bottles were subsequently analyzed for bacterial growth. Results: The contamination rates for the heparin lock, Interlink, Key-Lok, and SafSite went 3/50 (6%), 6/50 (12%), 4/50 (8%), and 36/50 (72%), respect ively All positive cultures grew coagulase-negative staphylococcus species. There was no difference in contamination rates between the InterLink, Key- Lok, and heparin lock designs. The contamination rate of the SafSite was hi gher (P < 0.001) than the other three systems. Conclusions: The Interlink and Key-Lok systems had a similarly low contamin ation susceptibility as a standard needle injection system. It was not dear if the high contamination rate found with the SafSite system was due to no n-adherence to the manufacturer's directions for handling.