M. Xhignesse et al., Antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapies for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Are we doing enough?, CAN J CARD, 15(2), 1999, pp. 185-189
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether current recommendations with respect to the
treatment of dyslipidemias and the use of antiplatelet agents are being app
lied in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care
settings.
DESIGN: Descriptive study based on data from the FAMUS (FAmily Medicine, Un
iversite de Sherbrooke) primary care register.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Two-hundred and thirty-three physicians participa
ting in the FAMUS project contributed information from nonpregnant patients
over 20 years of age consulting for a periodic health examination between
1992 and 1996.
INTERVENTIONS: Data from patients in secondary prevention (those with or ha
ving had angina, a previous myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, coronary
angioplasty or peripheral vascular disease) were extracted and analyzed.
MAIN RESULTS: Of the 52,505 patients in the register, 4315 (8%) were identi
fied as being in secondary prevention. Overall, 53% were noted as receiving
an antiplatelet agent while 4% were taking warfarin therapy. Only 64% (278
0) had a complete lipid profile on record while 38% were being treated with
a hypolipidemic agent. In the treated group, only 30% had a low density li
poprotein cholesterol level below 3.0 mmol/L compared with 22% in the untre
ated group.
CONCLUSIONS: A large number of patients identified as being in secondary pr
evention were not screened for dyslipidemias, and, of those who were, the m
ajority were undertreated according to current recommendations. Antiplatele
t agents were more widely prescribed but potentially underused.