Phase I/II trial of paclitaxel by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

Citation
Jd. Hainsworth et al., Phase I/II trial of paclitaxel by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, CANCER, 85(6), 1999, pp. 1269-1276
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER
ISSN journal
0008543X → ACNP
Volume
85
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1269 - 1276
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(19990315)85:6<1269:PITOPB>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
BAGKGROUND, The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is widely used in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. In t his Phase I/II study the authors evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and e fficacy of adding a third active antineoplastic agent, gemcitabine, to the paclitaxel/carboplatin combination for the treatment of patients with advan ced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. METHODS. Patients. with advanced WCC Stage IIIB or IV) nonsmall cell lung c arcinoma previously untreated with chemotherapy were eligible for this tria l. The maximum tolerated doses, determined in the Phase I trial and subsequ ently used in the Phase II trial, were: paclitaxel, 200 mg/m(2), as a 1-hou r infusion on Day 1; carboplatin, at area under the curve dose of 5.0 intra venously (i.v.), on Day 1; and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m(2) i.v., on Days 1 an d 8. Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days. The Phase II study was conducted in 13 community-based practices in the Minnie Pearl Cancer Resear ch Network; 77 patients were treated between December 1996 and September 19 97. RESULTS. Thirty-four of 77 patients (44%) in the Phase II trial had major r esponses (partial responses, 32 patients and complete responses, 2 patients ). An additional 25 patients (33%) had stable disease or minor response; on ly 23% of patients progressed or were removed from study at or prior to fir st reevaluation. The median survival was 9.4 months, with a 45% actuarial 1 -year survival rate. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity, with Gr ade 3/4 NCI Common Toxicity Criteria leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in 49% and 45% of patients, respectively. However, only 11 patients (14%) require d hospitalization for neutropenia/ fever, and none had bleeding complicatio ns. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue (41%), arthralgias /myalgias (26%), peripheral neuropathy (8%), nausea/emesis (6%), and hypers ensitivity reactions (4%). There was one treatment-related death due to sep sis. CONCLUSIONS. This three-drug regimen is active and has acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Myelosuppression, p articularly thrombocytopenia, is increased in comparison to the paclitaxel/ carboplatin regimen. Fatigue also may be increased, but other nonhematologi c toxicities are not altered substantially by adding gemcitabine. Although the response rate and median survival are improved modestly compared with o ur previous experience with paclitaxel/carboplatin, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of this regimen await the completion of randomized t rials. Cancer 1999;85:1269-76. (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.