Lm. Cupini et al., Does the antimigraine action of flunarizine involve the dopaminergic system? A clinical-neuroendocrinological study, CEPHALALGIA, 19(1), 1999, pp. 27-31
We have investigated the prolactin response to bromocriptine (BRC), a D2 do
pamine receptor agonist in migrainous women before and after treatment with
flunarizine. We evaluated whether this test was predictive of therapeutic
efficacy of flunarizine treatment and whether the therapeutic response to f
lunarizine treatment was related to its effect on dopaminergic system at tu
beroinfundibular level. Ten migrainous women underwent a BRC test in the la
te follicular phase before and after 1 and 3 months of treatment with fluna
rizine 10 mg at bedtime. Blood samples of prolactin (PRL), growth hormone,
follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol and progestero
ne were taken at basal condition. PRL was also evaluated 1 and 2 h after BR
C (2.5 mg) administration. Each patient kept a daily headache diary for 1 m
onth prior to the test and throughout the study. The level of PRL inhibitio
n after BRC administration, observed before flunarizine treatment, was not
predictive of the therapeutic response observed after 1 and 3 months of tre
atment. The effect of flunarizine on PRL level was not related to the thera
peutic efficacy of the drug. These data suggest that flunarizine does not a
ttenuate the activity of dopaminergic neurons in migrainous patients, and t
hat the antimigraine effect of flunarizine does not seem related to its act
ion on dopaminergic system at least at tuberoinfundibular level.