The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis states that pollution leve
ls increase as a country develops, but begin to decrease as rising incomes
pass beyond a turning point. In EKC analyses, the relationship between envi
ronmental degradation and income is usually expressed as a quadratic functi
on with the turning point occurring at a maximum pollution level. Other exp
lanatory variables have been included in these models, but income regularly
has had the most significant effect on indicators of environmental quality
. One variable consistently omitted in these relationships is the price of
energy. This paper analyzes previous models to illustrate the importance of
prices in these models and then includes prices in an econometric EKC fram
ework testing energy/income and CO2/income relationships. These long-run pr
ice/income models find that income is no longer the most relevant indicator
of environmental quality or energy demand. Indeed, we find no significant
evidence for the existence of an EKC within the range of current incomes fo
r energy in the presence of price and trade variables. (C) 1999 Elsevier Sc
ience B.V. All rights reserved.