Once only of significance to local communities, mangrove areas in the Phili
ppines are now an internationally visible and highly valued resource, princ
ipally as a consequence of the emergence of the shrimp culture industry. Th
is has resulted in a conflict with the traditional uses of the mangrove are
as, as unmodified ecosystems, including firewood gathering, thatch material
(Nypa species) for homes and mangrove poles for lumber and construction ma
terials, and nursery grounds for the small scale and commercial marine fish
eries. In effect, mangrove forested areas in the Philippines have been stea
dily transferred from a common property resource, of multiple use and benef
it to a large number of people, to a private good, of single use for shrimp
ponds, whose profits are narrowly channeled to the benefit of a select few
. This paper examines the trade-offs of this change in mangrove area use. T
he trade-offs are examined through three interlinked analyses. The first is
a population dynamics model which illustrates the effect of the changes in
the habitat (mangrove hectares) to the population of a single mangrove-dep
endent fish species from the family Leiognathidae. The paper then applies a
n assumed stock loss scenario from the model to a multiple objective benefi
t analysis and evaluates the net benefits obtained under three alternatives
for the mangrove area: (1) leaving the area undeveloped; (2) developing th
e area for polyculture; and (3) developing the area for semi-intensive shri
mp aquaculture. The procedure in the multiple objective benefit analysis is
to classify the benefits to each group affected by the decision and the co
nsequences or net benefits to the groups in aggregate. The results are disc
ussed vis-a-vis social equity issues. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All ri
ghts reserved.