Correct interpretations of hybridization phenomena rely on accurate methods
of detecting hybrids and estimating genotypic classes. Multilocus molecula
r data sets have proved to be particularly useful for hybrid identification
and genealogical reconstruction. One widely recognized limitation to this
approach is that hybrid and parental genotypic classes often differ minimal
ly in terms of expected marker numbers, and an extremely large number of mo
lecular markers are required to distinguish between them. A more fundamenta
l difficulty, and the focus of this study, concerns the potential for selec
tion to bias marker numbers in hybrids, thus leading to faulty genealogical
assignments. In this paper, we compare observed and expected marker number
s in 170 hybrids of known pedigree between two wild sunflower species, Heli
anthus annuus and H. petiolaris. All 170 hybrid plants had fewer H. petiola
ris markers than the expected means. In fact, with the exception of two ind
ividuals, marker numbers were more consistent with pedigrees involving thre
e to seven backcrossed generations, rather than the two generations of back
crossing actually employed. Although the implications of these data for gen
ealogical reconstruction are discouraging, it is the actual genetic constit
ution of hybrids, not the pedigree, that is most predictive of their charac
teristics or behavior. Thus, we suggest that hybrids be classified either i
n terms of genetic relatedness or in terms of the admixture of parental-spe
cies genes they carry. Both represent simple approaches for generating biol
ogically cohesive categories for ecological or comparative studies.